dc.description.abstract |
Corporate governance has become a burning issue in the corporate finance literature and
draws attention from corporate policymakers around the globe owing to many scams and
collapses recorded in corporate houses. CG mechanisms act as a guide in the hands of
corporate policymakers to regulate corporate entities and enhance corporate performance.
Many studies have been conducted on corporate governance issues using a developed
country setting but a few studies are available in the literature that investigated corporate
governance issues using the developing country setting. The population of this study has
included all the DSE listed manufacturing companies from 2006-17. BSEC promulgated
the corporate governance code of best practice in 2006 and revised it later in 2012. Hence,
the study tried to recognize the impacts of CG mechanisms on performance by dividing the
study period into two stories, the first one from 2006-11 and the other one from 2012-17.
The research framework explains how CG mechanisms- internal and external-can
influence corporate financial performance. The internal corporate governance mechanisms
are board size, board independence, board audit committee size, female directorship, CEO
duality, and ownership concentration. The external corporate governance mechanisms are
institutional ownership, financial leverage, and SEC guidelines. The control variables are
the firm size and firm age. The dependent variable is corporate financial performance
measured by Tobin’s Q and ROA. This study is empirical in nature and explains several
theories, such as agency theory, institutional theory, stakeholder theory, resource
dependency theory, stewardship theory, political economy theory, social theory, trade-off
theory, and M-M theorem. It used the quantitative research method and based mainly on
the premises of agency theory, though some other theories mentioned above help develop
the hypotheses.--
Regarding internal CG mech |
en_US |